Ripple CTO Responds to New Satoshi Nakamoto Identity Rumors

Whereas the crypto group has lengthy gotten used to waves of hypothesis about who may be behind the Satoshi Nakamoto title, a latest authorized transfer by lawyer James Murphy — identified to many on-line as MetaLawMan — has as soon as once more nudged the dialog in surprising instructions, together with towards Ripple Chief Expertise Officer David Schwartz.

Murphy has filed a lawsuit in opposition to the U.S. Division of Homeland Safety, urgent for the discharge of paperwork which will, in response to his argument, make clear conferences reportedly held between the company and people related to Bitcoin’s early improvement.

Murphy appears to imagine that someplace in these information may lie the lacking hyperlink that lastly attaches a real-world identification to Bitcoin’s thriller founder.

Because the crypto world caught wind of this, the ripple impact led some lovers to revisit outdated theories about who Satoshi might be, and as soon as once more, Schwartz’s title entered the chat.

Given his intensive cryptography background, his function as one of many key architects of the XRP Ledger and his deep involvement in blockchain infrastructure, it isn’t precisely shocking that his title sometimes pops up in these sorts of conversations — even when he has addressed the concept earlier than.

In a typical crypto-Twitter trend, somebody joked that if Schwartz had been Satoshi, now may be a reasonably good time to take the cash and run.

His response? A tongue-in-cheek nod within the type of a GIF from South Park, the place a personality explains that the cash is gone — a light-weight, barely ironic gesture that appeared to acknowledge the absurdity of the hypothesis with out giving it an excessive amount of weight.

Schwartz beforehand clarified he didn’t grow to be conscious of Bitcoin till 2011, which was nicely after its launch, and has been constant in saying that whereas he may need had the ability set, he was not concerned.

Nonetheless, the curiosity round Nakamoto’s identification by no means fairly disappears — it simply shifts with the headlines.