Polygon zkEVm falls behind StarkNet and zkSync Era, what next?
- Polygon zkEVM exercise paled in comparison with StarkNet and zkSync Period.
- Polygon utilization and MATIC market cap remained de-coupled.
Polygon [MATIC] has been performing nicely within the cryptocurrency house, with every day energetic customers on its community staying constant all through market cycles. Nevertheless, its underperformance within the zkSync house may influence the protocol’s future development.
Is your portfolio inexperienced? Try the Polygon Revenue Calculator
Falling behind
Primarily based on Artemis’ knowledge, the transaction quantity on Polygon’s zkEVM reached 14,780, indicating decrease exercise in comparison with different protocols like StarkNet and zkSync Period. At press time, StarkNet recorded 214,900 every day transactions, whereas zkSync Period boasted of 663,690 every day transactions.
The surge in exercise on StarkNet and zkSync Period may very well be attributed to AirDrop hunters ready for token drops on each these protocols. Nevertheless, as seen earlier with Arbitrum, if these protocols retain customers, they might see vital development and provides Polygon a run for its cash.
Supply: Artemis
The decline in exercise on the Polygon protocol may influence MATIC as nicely. At press time, nonetheless, Polygon’s utilization and MATIC’s value weren’t instantly co-related.
An odd relationship
Based on Messari’s knowledge, the connection between Polygon’s cumulative market capitalization and person base doesn’t seem to maneuver in tandem at a holistic degree. As a substitute, their actions may be categorized into three distinct phases.
.@0xPolygon‘s cumulative market cap and person base don’t seem to maneuver in tandem, a minimum of not at a holistic degree.
Quite, there are three distinct phases of their actions:
+Part 1: Progress
+Part 2: Deviation
+Part 3: Maturation pic.twitter.com/sYnugoD5Pu— Messari (@MessariCrypto) May 22, 2023
Within the first part, characterised as “Progress,” person exercise lags behind market cap development by roughly two months, with a correlation coefficient of 0.96. This implies that because the market cap of Polygon grows, person exercise follows swimsuit, albeit with a slight delay.
The second part, termed “Deviation,” reveals that market cap development primarily stems from the efficiency of MATIC, Polygon’s native token. Nevertheless, throughout this part, person development experiences a stall, indicating a divergence between market cap growth and person base improvement.
Learn Polygon’s [MATIC] Value Prediction 2023-2024
Lastly, within the third part, referred to as “Maturation,” the person base of Polygon exhibits unbiased development no matter market cap fluctuations. This implies that the adoption and growth of Polygon’s platform continues to draw customers even when market cap dynamics could indirectly affect person exercise.
Supply: Messari
What’s MATIC thus far?
After testing the resistance degree of $1.056 on 26 April, MATIC’s value fell by 19.43%. At press time, MATIC was buying and selling at $0.851. Its RSI had declined considerably previously few days, suggesting that momentum was with MATIC sellers for the time being.
Supply: TradingView
