Bankless Co-Founder Explains Why He Sold All His Ethereum

Bankless co-founder David Hoffman mentioned he offered his ETH after concluding that the “ETH is cash” thesis has largely performed out, marking a notable shift from one among Ethereum’s most seen public advocates. Hoffman mentioned he stays “massively bullish” on Ethereum as a community, however not sees a transparent path for ETH, the asset, to obtain a structural rerating from right here.

“For somebody who constructed a profession, group, id, and enterprise round Ethereum, this alternative doesn’t come evenly,” Hoffman wrote. “The ETH is Cash thesis didn’t fail… it performed out. Ethereum acquired the ETH worth it deserves, and I don’t see ETH being rerated as an asset, increased or decrease.”

The argument is just not that Ethereum has failed. Hoffman’s thesis is extra uncomfortable for ETH holders: Ethereum might proceed to succeed as infrastructure whereas solely a marginal share of that success accrues to ETH itself. In his framing, the community has develop into one among crypto’s most necessary open-source programs, however its design selections more and more favor purposes, rollups and exterior financial property over ETH’s personal financial premium.

Hoffman Says Ethereum’s Financial Window Is Closing

Hoffman described Ethereum as an unlimited coordination sport, the place the “ETH is cash” thesis required a number of layers of the ecosystem to align without delay. Ethereum wanted decentralized management, responsive governance, quick technical execution, coherent L2 incentives, and sufficient market dominance to make ETH the pure financial Schelling level of the ecosystem.

Associated Studying

That, he argued, was all the time a slender path. “Cash is a coordination sport, and coordination is tough,” Hoffman wrote. “The Ethereum challenge itself is a stacked set of coordination challenges throughout a number of layers, and the ‘ETH is cash’ thesis required all of them to succeed, and succeed with confidence.”

In Hoffman’s view, Ethereum made the tougher architectural alternative in contrast with Bitcoin. Bitcoin stripped its base layer all the way down to elevate BTC’s financial function. Ethereum added programmability and sought to maximise blockspace utility. That method created huge floor space for adoption, but in addition made ETH’s financial standing depending on Ethereum successful throughout expertise, tradition, governance and market construction on the identical time.

Hoffman mentioned Ethereum achieved “among the means there,” however not the maximal model of the thesis many ETH bulls as soon as anticipated.

Charges, L2s And The Asset-Seize Downside

A central a part of Hoffman’s argument is that smart-contract L1 tokens stay tied to exercise, charges and income. He pointed to ETH’s dominance in 2021, Solana’s resurgence in 2024, NEAR’s 2026 rerating alongside income and burn development, and long-running charge turbines similar to BNB and TRX as examples of the market rewarding chains that retain or develop direct income seize.

Ethereum, against this, has intentionally moved towards a construction the place worth leaks outward. Rollups scale execution, purposes seize extra of the user-facing margin, and Ethereum gives safe settlement at low price. Hoffman described this as a characteristic of Ethereum’s ideology and structure, however a problem for ETH as an asset.

“At its coronary heart, Ethereum is a giver, not a taker,” he wrote. “It provides L2s with the world’s most safe blockspace, at price. It tokenizes the property of your complete world, at price.”

Associated Studying

That framing sits on the core of his choice. Ethereum could also be “noble,” “good,” and “the world’s most profitable non-profit,” Hoffman argued, however that doesn’t robotically make ETH a greater funding from this level ahead. He mentioned the rollup-centric roadmap means L2s can take “97% margins,” whereas the fat-app thesis leaves extra economics with purposes somewhat than the bottom asset.

Stablecoins And The ‘Sturdy Crypto’ Downside

Hoffman additionally argued that Ethereum’s utility might more and more strengthen different types of cash. He famous that Ethereum hosted $3 billion in stablecoins in 2020 and $163 billion right now, a 54x enhance. The community’s success as settlement infrastructure, in that sense, has helped develop tokenized {dollars}, not essentially ETH’s function as cash.

He additionally questioned whether or not the “robust model” of crypto (DeFi, NFTs, DAOs and another monetary system constructed for its personal sake) ever grew to become a steady sufficient cultural or financial equilibrium. The second when ETH functioned most convincingly as web cash, he argued, coincided with the COVID-era surge in on-line exercise, danger urge for food and public fascination with crypto.

“ETH excelled as web cash on the precise second everybody was pressured onto the web,” Hoffman wrote. “The world found cryptocurrency for the primary time, and for that temporary window, it was cool.”

The implication is that ETH’s financial premium might have relied on a broader crypto-native increase that didn’t maintain. Ethereum stored constructing, however the public narrative round crypto shifted again towards scams, grifts and hypothesis, weakening the social basis wanted for ETH to develop into a dominant store-of-value asset.

Hoffman closed by stressing that he’s not bearish on Ethereum itself. His choice, he mentioned, displays a capital allocation name after the “ETH is cash” thesis reached a mature consequence.

At press time, ETH traded at $2,080.

Featured picture created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com