‘We won’t take Satoshi’s BTC’- eCash founder defends Bitcoin hard fork plans

Peter Sztorc, a long-time developer, has defended his Bitcoin hardfork plans by way of eCash, dismissing latest claims of plans to steal Satoshi’s 1.1 million BTC.
In a press release on the twenty eighth of April, Sztorc clarified,
We don’t take any of Satoshi’s BTC. We **present** Satoshi 600,000 eCash, as an alternative of gifting 1.1 million. That’s **600k extra** than Satoshi obtained from Litecoin, Ethereum, Solana, Tether, and so on (ie, 0).


A tough fork occurs when a blockchain splits into two separate entities, every working independently. Sztorc’s eCash Bitcoin exhausting fork proposal was floated final week, and it’s scheduled to go reside in August at block top 964,000.
Per his plan, the cut up permits BTC holders to have eCash on a 1:1 foundation. Meaning, after the exhausting fork, customers holding 2 BTC may also obtain 2 eCash. The brand new chain will function Ethereum‑type Layer 2 ‘drivechains,’ making it programmable for sensible contracts.
In line with Sztorc, the drivechains will allow numerous purposes, together with privateness, quantum resistance, prediction markets, and extra. However some neighborhood members strongly slammed the exhausting fork plans.
Bitcoin exhausting fork plan elicits criticism
In line with Peter McCormack, a BTC investor and chairman of Actual Bedford FC, Sztorc’s plans have been ‘poor decisions.’ He claimed that the exhausting fork’s deliberate 1:1 redemption for Satoshi Bitcoin for eCash was ‘theft and disrespectful.’
Apart from, the Lightning Community already makes use of a privateness function known as ecash, which may possible confuse the neighborhood.


In response, nevertheless, Sztorc claimed that Satoshi Nakamoto’s BTC cash will stay intact. Nevertheless, about 600K of his 1.1 million ‘gifted’ eCash tokens will probably be offered to fund the challenge.
Will eCash escape previous Bitcoin exhausting fork failures?
However this isn’t the primary try to enhance the Bitcoin community by way of exhausting forks. In 2017, Bitcoin Money (BCH) and Bitcoin Gold (BTG) have been proposed to make sure low cost transfers and decentralized mining, respectively.
BCH succeeded in enabling quicker, cheaper transactions. Nevertheless, it didn’t construct sufficient belief, resulting in a decline in worth and hash charge relative to the unique Bitcoin community. Alternatively, Bitcoin Gold has turn out to be irrelevant after struggling a number of 51% safety assaults amid low hashrate.
In 2018, one other exhausting fork, Bitcoin SV (BSV), additionally failed to realize traction to attain its bigger blocks (as much as 2 GB) to allow large knowledge and thousands and thousands of transactions. High exchanges like Coinbase delisted the token.
In actual fact, different proposals, like Mt. Gox’s exhausting fork, didn’t even see the sunshine of day. It stays to be seen whether or not eCash will escape pitfalls suffered by previous exhausting forks.
Remaining Abstract
- Peter Sztorc clarified that the eCash Bitcoin exhausting fork is a 1:1 ‘present’ of tokens and never a theft of Satoshi’s BTC.
- Nevertheless, the neighborhood has raised ethics and viability issues forward of the August implementation.





